Predict electronic band gaps from crystal structures
This tool provides approximate band gap estimates for uploaded crystal structures (CIF format). Key features:
Our premium reports offer detailed band gap analysis using advanced computational methods. Available in the Pricing section.
Analyze oxygen migration pathways
This tool visualizes and analyzes oxygen ion migration pathways in crystal structures (CIF format). Key features:
Our premium reports offer detailed oxygen migration pathways analysis. Available in the Pricing section.
_cell_formula_units_Z
)
_cell_formula_units_Z
)
Our methods show consistent agreement with experimental studies across various material classes:
For detailed information about our theoretical approaches and software packages, please read DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-823144-9.00062-5.
When using results from this service in publications or research, please include a citation reference to this page:
LLC "Materials Analyzer". (2025). Materials Analyzer - Band Gap Estimation. https://materials-analyzer.info
Materials Analyzer - Band Gap Estimation. materials-analyzer.info. Accessed XX Month 2025.
Materials Analyzer - Band Gap Estimation, https://materials-analyzer.info (accessed Month XX, 2025)
Анализ Материалов. Предсказание ширины запрещенной зоны [Электронный ресурс]. — Режим доступа: https://materials-analyzer.info (дата обращения: dd.mm.yyyy).
LLC "Materials Analyzer". (2025). Materials Analyzer - OxyHopper. https://materials-analyzer.info
Materials Analyzer - OxyHopper. materials-analyzer.info. Accessed XX Month 2025.
Materials Analyzer - OxyHopper, https://materials-analyzer.info (accessed Month XX, 2025)
Анализ Материалов. Анализ миграций кислорода [Электронный ресурс]. — Режим доступа: https://materials-analyzer.info (дата обращения: dd.mm.yyyy).
We appreciate your support in acknowledging our service.
Number of materials of each major computational materials databases used to create this dataset.
The prediction model was specifically trained on AnBnOn structures. Results for other material classes may not be accurately predicted.
A high-throughput framework for computational materials science that automates calculations and provides a comprehensive database of material properties.
Richard H. Taylor, Frisco Rose, Cormac Toher, Ohad Levy, Kesong Yang, Marco Buongiorno Nardelli, Stefano Curtarolo. A RESTful API for exchanging materials data in the AFLOWLIB.org consortium, Computational Materials Science, Volume 93, 2014, Pages 178-192, ISSN 0927-0256An open database of computed materials properties designed to accelerate materials innovation by providing researchers with powerful tools for materials design.
Horton, M.K., Huck, P., Yang, R.X. et al. Accelerated data-driven materials science with the Materials Project. Nat. Mater. (2025)The Open Quantum Materials Database contains DFT calculated thermodynamic and structural properties for hundreds of thousands of materials.
Saal, J. E., Kirklin, S., Aykol, M., Meredig, B., and Wolverton, C. "Materials Design and Discovery with High-Throughput Density Functional Theory: The Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD)", JOM 65, 1501-1509 (2013)Proportion of correctly predicted instances
Ratio of true positives to all predicted positives
Ratio of true positives to all actual positives
Harmonic mean of precision and recall
Proportion of variance explained by the model
Root Mean Square Error - standard deviation of residuals
Mean Square Error - average squared difference
The Band Gap Estimator for Classification demonstrates excellent performance across all metrics with accuracy at 98.219%. The high precision (98.251%) and recall (97.709%) values indicate a well-balanced model with strong predictive capabilities.
The Band Gap Estimator for Regression shows strong performance with an R² value of 0.9507, indicating that the model explains approximately 95% of the variance in the target variable. The low RMSE (0.2695) and MSE (0.0726) values confirm the model's accuracy in predictions.
Proportion of correctly predicted instances
Ratio of true positives to all predicted positives
Ratio of true positives to all actual positives
Harmonic mean of precision and recall
Proportion of variance explained by the model
Root Mean Square Error - standard deviation of residuals
Mean Square Error - average squared difference
The Band Gap Estimator for Classification demonstrates great performance across all metrics with accuracy at 88.579%. The high precision (86.569%) and recall (83.794%) values indicate a well-balanced model with high predictive capabilities.
The Band Gap Estimator for Regression shows strong performance with an R² value of 0.9026, indicating that the model explains approximately 90% of the variance in the target variable. The low RMSE (0.37947) and MSE (0.014724) values confirm the model's accuracy in predictions.